San Francisco has formally requested state regulators redo an August listening to that expanded robotaxi permits for Cruise and Waymo, giving each firms permission to widen industrial operations all through the town 24/7.
The contentious resolution was met with a lot opposition as metropolis businesses and residents questioned the far-reaching affect of the expansions. The permits present no limitations on geographic space, service hours or fleet measurement, one thing opponents say may result in uncapped numbers of robotaxis roaming the streets. Neither is there a requirement that Cruise or Waymo report the incidents of robotaxis malfunctioning and “bricking” in visitors, blocking the movement of different highway customers, public transit and first responders.
SF Metropolis Lawyer David Chiu filed the request on behalf of metropolis transit and planning officers. Chiu had additionally requested a short lived halt of the expansions days after the California Public Utilities Fee’s (CPUC) listening to, however the company by no means responded. The town’s purposes, which had been filed Monday, reiterate the request for a short lived pause.
“These autos could possibly drive themselves, however they’ll’t regulate themselves,” mentioned Chiu in a press release. “The CPUC should do this to guard passenger and public security. For the reason that CPUC’s resolution to permit unfettered enlargement of AVs for industrial passenger service in San Francisco, AVs have continued to current security dangers and intrude with first responders.”
Chiu urged the CPUC to rethink its resolution, accusing the company of utilizing a flawed approval course of and ignoring public security hazards and potential environmental impacts of AVs.
“AV expertise has a spot in San Francisco, however we’re involved it’s not but able to safely working in our advanced transportation surroundings,” continued Chiu.
The CPUC’s main function is to advertise the general public curiosity by guaranteeing protected, dependable and reasonably priced utility companies. So long as Cruise and Waymo’s companies meet these necessities, the CPUC doesn’t have the authority to restrict them. The company voted in favor of allow expansions in August as a result of it didn’t anticipate the robotaxi companies to lead to vital security dangers.
Each Cruise and Waymo autos have been concerned in collisions, however to date, no human has died because of these collisions, and accidents have been minimal. That mentioned, within the aftermath of the CPUC listening to, a Cruise car was concerned in a crash with a hearth truck, which injured one passenger. The California Division of Motor Automobiles ordered Cruise to instantly scale back its fleet by 50% whereas it investigates “current regarding incidents.”
Many of the different “regarding incidents” just lately (and over the previous yr) have concerned primarily Cruise autos bricking in the midst of public roads. On August 16, 10 Cruise robotaxis stalled, making a gridlock in North Seaside for about 20 minutes throughout one of many metropolis’s largest music festivals.
Cruise’s public backlash got here to a head in early September after a San Francisco Hearth Division report accused a Cruise robotaxi of blocking an ambulance carrying a passenger who later died, an accusation Cruise denied. Protestors rallied final week outdoors Cruise’s headquarters in protest. TechCrunch seen the footage and confirmed that Cruise didn’t hinder the actions of the ambulance. The fireplace division later clarified that Cruise was not at fault.
Nevertheless, the harm to Cruise’s fame was executed, and the incident offered a stark picture of what would possibly occur if a Cruise car bricked in entrance of an ambulance on, say, a one-way road with minimal house for the ambulance to get round it.
“The businesses will not be required to report—and even to trace—such essential incidents and interference occasions,” reads the town legal professional’s request. “Consequently, San Francisco’s evaluation of those incidents relies upon fully on happenstance studies from members of the general public and affected Metropolis staff.”
Cruise and Waymo did share some knowledge throughout an August assembly with metropolis stakeholders and the CPUC to handle considerations earlier than the company’s vote. In line with Cruise’s knowledge, from January 1 to July 18, 2023, there have been 177 “car retrieval occasions,” that are situations of a bricked Cruise robotaxi that must be picked up by a human. The typical decision time was 14 minutes.
Waymo’s knowledge confirmed 58 retrieval occasions, averaging 10 minutes for decision, from January 1 to June 30, 2023.
Metropolis officers mentioned these occasions solely make up a subset of the full variety of sudden stops. Between April 2022 and April 2023, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Company (SFMTA) collected a complete of 261 incidents involving a Cruise car and 85 involving a Waymo. These incidents embody a number of sorts of driving habits, together with sudden stops, erratic driving, points with pickup and drop-off, and collisions.
The town legal professional’s workplace requests that the CPUC not solely undertake new reporting necessities for AV firms, however that these studies be made public with out redactions. These studies ought to accumulate knowledge on month-to-month drivered and driverless car miles traveled by county, road intereference incidents, all crashes and excessive danger violations. The request additionally asks the CPUC to think about guaranteeing that AV enlargement is granted in an incremental, performance-based method in order that it doesn’t generate “widespread new hazards for vacationers and most of the people.”
“The CPUC’s resolution was the results of a months-long course of that noticed public enter and assist from accessibility teams, labor unions, and group advocates — culminating in a six-hour public remark interval the place the bulk supported expanded AV entry,” Navideh Forghani, a spokesperson for Cruise, instructed TechCrunch. “It’s unlucky to see the town use public sources to bypass that call and limit a expertise with a superb security report utilized by tens of hundreds of SF residents.”
“We absolutely assist the CPUC’s fastidiously thought-about resolution to authorize Waymo to cost fares for driverless rides,” mentioned Waymo spokesperson Katherine Barna. “We are going to comply with this growth carefully, and within the meantime, we’ll proceed to work with the town of San Francisco in constructive methods whereas offering protected and accessible mobility to San Franciscans.”